Research

Partisanship Against Principle in Public Opinion on Same-Day Registration

Forthcoming in Public Opinion Quarterly.

Voter access has become a deeply polarized issue in American politics. It is well-known that policymakers’ positions on election laws are often dictated by whether they think the laws will help their electoral interests and those of their party. But we know little about whether public opinion on election laws is similarly driven by partisan interest or is instead constrained by concerns of procedural legitimacy. To answer this question, I conduct a survey experiment that frames the issue of same-day registration (SDR) in terms of which major party it is expected to help electorally. The results provide clear evidence that both Democrats and Republicans are less likely to support SDR after being told the policy will primarily increase turnout among voters of the opposing party, but little evidence that being told SDR will benefit their own party affects opinion. These findings suggest an asymmetry in citizens’ willingness to choose partisan interest over democratic principles based on whether they perceive a rule change as benefiting the in-party or out-party.

The Limits of Partisanship in Citizen Preferences on Redistricting

In progress, draft available on request.

The most commonly accepted model of public attitudes toward election rules assumes that citizens follow the cues of their preferred party’s elites and support rules that would benefit that party in elections. This paper proposes an alternative model in which most citizens prefer fair electoral institutions at the expense of partisan interest when that choice is made explicit, while a minority of committed partisans are driven by partisanship. To test this theory I use two survey experiments and the specific case of redistricting to determine how the presence of party labels and evidence of the opposing party behaving unfairly affect citizens’ choice between a “partisan gerrymander” district map and a “nonpartisan fair” map. The first experiment finds that while introducing party labels makes partisans more likely on average to choose a gerrymandered map, a clear majority of partisans choose a nonpartisan map across all experimental conditions. Only the those citizens who strongly identify as members of a political party or score highly on a measure of negative partisanship are likely to choose partisanship over fairness. The second experiment finds that presenting Democrats with evidence of egregious Republican gerrymandering causes them to be more likely to support similar pro-Democratic gerrymandering, but the reverse was not true for Republicans.

Gender-Based Voting in New Hampshire State Legislative Elections

In progress, draft available on request.

Researchers studying women’s representation have long sought to determine whether voters have a bias toward choosing male or female candidates. While survey experiments have identified gender biases in voters, observational studies of voter behavior in partisan elections have largely failed to find a significant effect of candidate gender on vote choice. This paper demonstrates that in at least one state, New Hampshire, voters are significantly more likely to vote for women than men in state legislative elections. Using the unique nature of the New Hampshire state house’s large multi-member districts, I show that this gender gap is not caused by a “cream of the crop” selection bias in which only the best female candidates run for office, as suggested by previous research, but instead by a voter preference for female candidates.  I also find that the use of multi-member districts may contribute to women’s electoral advantage.

A Survey of Public Opinion on Ranked Choice Voting

In progress, draft available on request.

Ranked choice voting (RCV), a reform of traditional plurality voting in which voters rank their preferred candidates, is increasingly used in American state and local elections. With RCV being more widely considered as a voting system, there have been several attempts in recent years to measure public support for RCV. However, there has not yet been any effort to summarize the degree and demographic composition of this support. This paper brings together public opinion data on ranked choice voting from four recent surveys: two national surveys and polling from Maine and Santa Fe, where RCV was used in the 2018 elections. It finds that expressed support for RCV varies drastically depending on question wording, ranging from 23% to 55% in national surveys. Furthermore, it consistently finds across surveys that RCV support tends to be highest among Democrats, liberals, and the highly educated. After controlling for these factors, RCV support tends to be lower among blacks and women.